Talk:Petition for Muslim worship at Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba

Requested move 15 February 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved to Petition for Muslim worship at Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba. There is consensus that both the original title and proposed title are unclear. Breaking down the title into two parts: what and 'where'. First, tackling the 'where': there is consensus to be consistent with the parent topic with regards to the name of the location. Second, tackling the 'what': it is unclear by what's 'Muslim campaign' with a concurrence on that it could mean a historical Muslim military campaign. Among the different alternative suggestions, there is a consensus on Petition for Muslim worship at Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba as being the most clearly identifying title. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Muslim campaign at Córdoba Cathedral → Muslim campaign at the Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba – It should be renamed the same way as the article of "Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba" since it’s historically was both a mosque and a cathedral 154.136.167.155 (talk) 00:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   21:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Neither the current title nor the proposed makes any sense. Srnec (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: WikiProject Islam has been notified of this discussion.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   21:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: WikiProject Catholicism has been notified of this discussion.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   21:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: WikiProject Spain has been notified of this discussion.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   21:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support as consistent with nomenclature for the structure across multiple articles. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Both titles are unclear; reading the title alone, I thought it would be about an historic military campaign at the cathedral. I would favor a title something like "Muslim worship at Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba", "Petition for Muslim worship at Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba", or "21st century Muslim worship at Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba". I have no opinion on the matter of "Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba" versus "Cathedral of Córdoba". –Zfish118⋉talk 16:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd suggest adding the word prayer before campaign for clarity. The name of the building would just reflect what the title of the page for the building. --Killuminator (talk) 06:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Support Petition for Muslim worship at Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba as the title that most clearly identifies the article topic. As the nominator mentions, the "Córdoba Cathedral" phrasing should be replaced to be WP:CONSISTENT with Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba – but at the same time, I concur with Zfish that the phrasing "Muslim campaign" suggests a historical military campaign. Any title that fixes both phrasing issues is satisfactory, in my view, with the one I highlighted above being the one that I personally find most effective. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)