Talk:Phacellophyllum caespitosum

Comments more appropriate to talk page
I moved the block of text added as edit suggestions here and restored the original brief text of the article; if anyone wants to make the following changes, feel free. Her Pegship (talk) 18:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The present page contains few serious errors... * Phacellophyllum Gurich, 1909, is a junior synonym of Thamnophyllum Penecke, 1894; in case of synonymy the principle of priority states that the senior synonym should be used - in the present case Thamnophyllum wins with Phacellophyllum unless you can prove the two names are not synonyma. ** Anyway both names pertain to genera of the extinct Devonian family Phillipsastreidae, (and not to the Carboniferous family Lithostrotionidae) of the order Rugosa and not Tabulata. *** Thamnophyllum Penecke, 1894 (and its junior synonym Phacellophyllum Gurich, 1909) are colonial, dendroid to fasciculate corals, with horseshoe dissepiments and septa of trabecular fans, as revealed in thin sections. **** The cited link to Masutomi & Hamada, 1966, illustrates an uncut solitary rugosan, with attached old label naming Ceriopora verrucosa from "Gerolstein bei Eifel" in Rhenish Devonian in Germany; it is obviously a solitary rugose coral - as it is uncut its taxonomic position, not to say affinity with the Phillipsastreidae and Thamnophyllum, must remain dubious... ***** I have no idea how Phacellophyllum caespitosum looks like, as the following link is to a void page...