Talk:Phagocyte/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Congratulations to all who have worked on the article, it's currently very well written. I initially checked the 'quick-fail criteria' and you'll be pleased to know that the article has not failed on these points. The article is well sourced, neutral, lacks cleanup banners, and has no edit conflicts. There were a few minor formatting issues which I fixed using an automated tool. Feel free to check the diff here.

The aetiology of the word Phagocyte should be mentioned in brackets after the bold subject in the lead paragraph. I've done this for you, feel free to take a look. I wasn't sure, however, whether I should play the ref tags inside or outside the brackets. This is personal preference in my honest opinion so you're welcome to change it. In the same edit I copyedited the entire article, but this mostly consisted of fixing whitespace issues and linking to articles. I still feel that more linking can be done but I'll leave that in your capable hands. See the diff here.

I've decided to pass this article, as it does not fail any criteria here. Good work guys, I look forward to seeing your work on future articles or on bringing this FAC. Congratulations once again. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 00:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)