Talk:Pharmacological cardiotoxicity

Review
Some of the phrases are hard to read. In particular, some of them are long, and shorter periods are preferable. Furthermore, some typos (grammar, misspells, capital letter misuse) were present. Some links were redirect links, even if the direct one was available. Finally, I would ask the author if it is possible to add an example of the antiarrhythmic drug, as done for the anticancer one in the very first section. Overall, the content of the article was fine. Isabella Poles (talk) 14:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your contribute 94MC94 (talk) 14:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Observations and suggestions for improvements
The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following an expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in July 2023. Probably a better title for this wikipedia voice could be Drug induced cardiotoxicity (DICT). The term pharmacological is too general and not correct for this application. In the section "Creation of a population of cellular action potentials", in the biomarkers list APD90 is repeated twice, the second i guess it should be APD50. In the definiton of TdPRS a parenthesis is missing on the denominator. Moreover in this section the equations should be better explained. For example it is not clear what EFTPC means.

--Aandurro (talk) 12:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)