Talk:Phi (Golden Ratio)

Merge with Golden ratio?
Is there any reason why should this NOt be merged to Golden ratio ? -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 04:21, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with merger. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Agree with merger, at a minimum. In this case, though, the so-called "merger" would consist of making this page a simple, but otherwise unnecessary, redirect to Golden ratio without incorporating any content from this article in Golden ratio. In the unlikely event that anyone is looking for golden ratio under Phi, the article Phi (letter) already disambiguates this and other uses of Phi. Therefore, without meaning to offend the author, who was probably well intentioned, the better solution is deletion of this article, in my opinion. Finell (Talk) 02:23, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Deletion thus meaning redirect. Yes, I will do it right now. I had notified the author at User talk:Bookworm6, to comment here. No comments came, so I guess there is no need to stretch this any longer. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:50, 17 November 2005 (UTC)