Talk:Phil&teds

Could someone more knowledgeable than me clean up the references? [7] and [8] in particular, I notice, have nothing to do with their location. [7] is the second page to a random NYTimes article that happens to mention phil&teds, while [8] appears to be a review. Maybe there is a space for these references, but I really don't think throwing them down there helps. Perhaps a "See Also" section would be more appropriate. Even then, though, I think we ought to stay away from a COI, so it might be better to get rid of these. Thoughts? Pongcody (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was move per request. Barring the manifestly improper, moving is the default for requested moves even with little or no participation since boldness allows moves without discussion. There is no need for a disambiguator here as there are no other articles on Wikipedia with titles that make this ambiguous.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Phil&amp;teds (strollers) → Phil&teds — - There is no reason to have the disambiguation "(stroller)" in the page name, except to circumvent the previous protection of the old name, which has had pages deleted twice per WP:CSD (blatant advertising). I cannot see the former versions, but it seems to me that this page is not blatant advertising, as it is not particularly effusive and does cite reliable sources.

But in either case, this page needs attention. If this page is just like those that have been deleted, then it should be deleted. If it isn't, then it should be moved to the proper name. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 15:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.