Talk:Phil Berger

Requested move 12 October 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Phil Berger (politician).. Per consensus, move Philip E. Berger to Phil Berger (politician) and no moves to the dab page. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

– The politician seems to be the overwhelmingly WP:PRIMARY. HandsomeFella (talk) 07:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Phil Berger → Phil Berger (disambiguation)
 * Philip E. Berger → Phil Berger

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support |Phil_Berger_Jr.|Phil_Berger_(ice_hockey) Pageviews are only 77%, but the father has more long-term significance/prominence as of now. Hameltion (talk &#124; contribs) 17:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Phil_Berger doesn't even render at all. When we add the disambiguation page into the previous pageviews link |Phil_Berger_Jr.|Phil_Berger_(ice_hockey)|Phil_Berger like this we see that it ceased being viewed about a year ago. I would guess that the search engines picked up on the titles and resolved ambiguous searches themselves. With so little organic traffic that we can't even identify it (a dozen a month?), is there any point in making any change here? --Joy (talk) 08:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The point is WP:COMMONNAME, but I forgot to mention it. He is usually referred to as Phil Berger. HandsomeFella (talk) 08:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure, but then I'd go for Phil Berger (politician) first. --Joy (talk) 14:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll accept that if that's the concensus. HandsomeFella (talk) 18:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose as proposed, but would support Philip E. Berger → Phil Berger (politician) per Joy. Both the father and the son are indeed referenced as "Phil", rather than as "Philip". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 07:06, 16 October 2023 (UTC)