Talk:Phil H. Bucklew/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:18, 12 January 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * I expanded the lead, I was keeping it concise as it's not a very long article.
 * I expanded the lead, I was keeping it concise as it's not a very long article.
 * I expanded the lead, I was keeping it concise as it's not a very long article.


 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * I was told this was optional, but have added in locations.
 * I was told this was optional, but have added in locations.


 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Married to the same woman for 46 years (till his death), no children.
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Married to the same woman for 46 years (till his death), no children.
 * Married to the same woman for 46 years (till his death), no children.


 * B. Focused:
 * Navy was having a drawdown, I'll pick up the book again and go more specific.
 * Navy was having a drawdown, I'll pick up the book again and go more specific.


 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Found one, scanned it, Navy photo from 1944
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Found one, scanned it, Navy photo from 1944
 * Found one, scanned it, Navy photo from 1944
 * Found one, scanned it, Navy photo from 1944


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'm a little confused by the turnover of the PT boats to the South Koreans. Was he in charge of the training team for them or what?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)