Talk:Phil Pressey/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Disc Wheel (talk · contribs) 15:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Everything checks out, the prose, lead, and sources. My only concern is the lack of photo(s). Are there not any available in the commons? I feel like you could put a picture of his father in near the personal section, provided there is one. The article just needs a single photo in my opinion. Disc Wheel ( Malk  +  Montributions )  15:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There are no images on commons. I have made some relicensing queries on flickr. However, WP:WIAGA does not require any images. Thus, if images are your only concern, this article should pass.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Never knew that... well good work then. Disc Wheel  ( Malk  +  Montributions )  16:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)