Talk:Philadelphia City Paper

Fair use rationale for Image:CP 2007-11-22.jpg
Image:CP 2007-11-22.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 one external links on Philadelphia City Paper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160128045729/http://www.pa-newspaper.org/docs/2012-professional-keystones/2012-keystone-winners-dv.pdf?sfvrsn=4 to http://www.pa-newspaper.org/docs/2012-professional-keystones/2012-keystone-winners-dv.pdf?sfvrsn=4
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110722115303/http://www.pa-newspaper.org/core/contentmanager/uploads/PDFs/Contests/division5%20winners.pdf to http://www.pa-newspaper.org/core/contentmanager/uploads/PDFs/Contests/division5%20winners.pdf
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110722115339/http://www.pa-newspaper.org/core/contentmanager/uploads/PDFs/Contests/WEB%202010%20Keystone%20winners-DVI.pdf to http://www.pa-newspaper.org/core/contentmanager/uploads/PDFs/Contests/WEB%202010%20Keystone%20winners-DVI.pdf
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110722115409/http://www.pa-newspaper.org/core/contentmanager/uploads/PDFs/Contests/NOYDiv_5.pdf to http://www.pa-newspaper.org/core/contentmanager/uploads/PDFs/Contests/NOYDiv_5.pdf
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080509061753/http://www.pa-newspaper.org/web/2005/09/keystone_press_awards.aspx to http://www.pa-newspaper.org/web/2005/09/keystone_press_awards.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Two tags conflict
'''This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a specific audience. (January 2016)''' '''This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2016)'''

Twelve inline citations, recently changed by a 'bot, are more than sufficient to support the details in the article. If some of the detail is removed, inline citations are likely to go with that detail. As a regular reader of this paper for many years, I know about it and was sorry to see it fold. As a member of the GoCE, I will do the copyediting in March. After that is done, I will consider removing the other two tags. Please comment, pro or con, on that removal after the copyediting.