Talk:Philip Gale/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû   (blah?)  02:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * B. Focused:
 * B. Focused:


 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments:
 * In infobox, occupation should list "student" since that was his occupation at TOD
 * Is it not possible to find his exact birthdate? It's not like he was born (or died) that long ago.
 * I believe this page should be at Philip Gale, not at Death of Philip Gale; he is known for more than his suicide.

Reliable sources/Neutral
 * The talk page raises a number of valid points about the sources of this article that I believe either a.) have not been addressed, or b.) have not been adequately addressed. See: Talk:Death of Philip Gale or Talk:Death of Philip Gale

Also the point in Talk:Death of Philip Gale needs to be addressed, because it really isn't possible for him to be 4th generation.

I am putting this article on hold. If you would like to request a second opinion, let me know. -- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû  (blah?)  04:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC) Nice article. Racepacket (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * In "People magazine" - I would not italicize "magazine"
 * File:Philip Gale.gif - I don't understand your fair use rationale.
 * I also would move the title to "Philip Gale"
 * So what happened to all of the stock options? Did they go away upon his death or did the family donate it to MIT?

In light of no new activity and no response, I am failing this GA. -- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû  (blah?)  15:14, 28 January 2011 (UTC)