Talk:Philip Lonergan

Reviewer Comment
Well, there have been at least two wrong answers with regard to this draft. [

User:ClarityFiend - Why was this draft Rejected rather than declined? On its face, it shows multiple films. In my opinion, a draft should only be Rejected for notability if it: Robert McClenon (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1. Has been deleted at AFD (and even then, sometimes a decline is better).
 * 2. Does not make a credible claim of significance, so that it would qualify for A7 in mainspace.
 * 3. It is being tendentiously resubmitted.

User:FloridaArmy - Do not simply resubmit a draft that was Rejected. That is normally considered disruptive, and is likely to result in deletion of the draft or a topic-ban. If you think that the rejection was improper (which it was), try to discuss this, if not with the rejecting reviewer, at the Teahouse, or somewhere, or somewhere else. You have already been sanctioned, and you do not need any partial blocks.

User:Theroadislong - Do you think that the subject does not satisfy creative notability?

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It's possible, but I don't think the draft shows that? The films that are sourced are not notable and the notable films have no sources to connect them. I would not have rejected it, FAs articles are usually hurriedly thrown together but rarely not notable . Theroadislong (talk) 19:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Theroadislong - I will let a fourth reviewer deal with it. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)