Talk:Philip Luty

legacy section
Is there any reason why the legacy section should not be removed entirely? There is not a single source in it, but a more fundamental problem is that there is nothing on its own terms that connects it to Philip Luty or his works. Philip Luty is not mentioned in the legacy section. Philip Luty's works are not mentioned in the legacy section. This, to me, reeks of original research, and it is (I guess) vaguely implying that maybe Luty was somehow connected with that incident just by the juxtaposition with the rest of the article without directly saying so or providing a source to that effect. I propose deleting the section or at the very least fundamentally reworking it to address these problems if someone wants to keep it.JMM12345 (talk) 22:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)JMM12345