Talk:Philippe Echaroux

Source-arrhea, for something
We're told:


 * Echaroux premiered his work in the rainforest in Amazonia.[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]

All those numbers aside, I don't even know what "Echaroux premiered his work in the rainforest in Amazonia" means:


 * Echaroux had done work somewhere, which he premiered [where?] in the rainforest in Amazonia [and when?].
 * Echaroux had done work in the rainforest in Amazonia, which he premiered [where and when?].
 * Echaroux had done work in the rainforest, which he premiered [where?] in Amazonia [and when?].

And there are more possibilities besides.

It's very rare for any assertion to benefit from being furnished with more than three sources. Which are the best five here? Cut the rest. -- Hoary (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

1
E 2A04:CEC0:104F:F952:0:F:D026:EC01 (talk) 09:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)