Talk:Philippine Span Asia Carrier Corporation

Sulpicio Lines Infamous in the Philippines and the world

I added this because it is notable to the subject. Please add more information about the Shipping Line. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.128.34.60 (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

This is one of the least neutral articles I have ever read on WikiPedia. While this company has clearly been involved in events such as the MV Dona Paz and the MV Princess of the Stars, there is no need to emphasize these events using words like "notorious". Let facts speak for themselves. WP is not a tabloid newspaper. -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 20:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I made this page this way because that sums up the history of the said company. The page would be practically useless if we would underplay its role as a world leader in commuter ship deaths. THe company is not known for anything else aside this. To hide this facts is untruthful

Background/History?
How come there aren't any regarding the company? The MV Dona Paz, et al. incidents are merely part of them. Where's the rest? How come it does not include info such as who founded the company, the structure of the company, current management, etc.

And did you just honestly copied and pasted a news bulletin/article in the Legal Controversies section? You didn't even bother rewriting/restructuring/summarizing it?

Red marquis (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Can we make an article regarding "Ship Incidents of Sulpicio Lines / PSACC" to have it separated from this one? Bumbl_loid 11:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bumbl loid (talk • contribs)

"Forged contract"
This is only a small part of the question about neutrality, but one thing that adds to it is the (perhaps) confusing use of "forged." The common English sense of the word is "to commit forgery -- to make something fake. I think (but I'm not sure enough to change it) that the meaning here of "forged contract" is "a contract was signed." In other words, "forged" is a verb, not an adjective. There's nothing in that section to suggest additional criminal activity in connection with the contract.

If I'm right, "contract signed" might be a better heading and the same change could be made in the text.

If it was a fake contract, then maybe the company is as evil as the writer contends. :-) Tito john (talk) 12:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)