Talk:Philosophical Reflections in the Naisadhacarita

recommend merge
I don't believe Wikipedia criteria for notability have been met by the text (a reprinted Ph.D. thesis) that is the topic of this article. Such evidence would include showing that the text has attracted scholarly attention by non-supervisors/non-evaluators of the thesis. The mentions of the work included in the current article are more akin to advertising.

I'd recommend that the few substantive remarks, namely those arguing that Sriharsha's Naisadhacaritam is nontrivially philosophical, should be incorporated into the main article on Naisadhacaritam, where they would be more helpful. This thesis can be cited there unproblematically as a source on Naisadhacaritam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunyataivarupam (talk • contribs) 23:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Agree, done. Jdcooper (talk) 01:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)