Talk:Pholiota flammans/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (talk) 09:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Issues
Interesting color, as if it were heavily dusted with pollen at a layman's glance. Another image would be great, of course, but not a problem with no more available. Right now, an initial define of stirps will do us. Also, is this about everything there is to write on? Rcej (talk) 09:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Added image of stem & gills; linked stirps. Have added a few more small details, but there's not much more I can find to write about this species. Sasata (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Good... again :-) Rcej (talk) 07:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Pholiota flammans passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: