Talk:Phosphatase/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' I am planning to review this article. Reviewer: SahabAliwadia (talk · contribs) 09:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Seriously? You need to first get yourself acquainted with Wikipedia's Identifying reliable sources. Your own created and written articles are in such a poor standard. --Saqib (talk) 09:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * This is not the place of fight. And this page is not your talk page so that you are saying me this. I found myself good for it, so I am doing it. Remember that were blocked once for your this act.  SahabAli wadia  09:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Ideally, our reviewers should have good knowledge of WP's policies and guidelines or at least should be able to identify between the reliable and non-reliable sources which you seems to be cannot, therefore I suggest you to avoid reviewing GA candidates for a while and take a moment to get some understanding of Identifying reliable sources. --Saqib (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Note The reviewer User:SahabAliwadia has been blocked so this review should be discarded. --Saqib (talk) 13:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Review is being terminated per the above and nomination returned without loss of seniority to the pool of nominations awaiting a qualified reviewer; original review was clearly unqualified and blocked for other cogent reasons shortly after his nine-minute review here. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Support
Support This article is well-written, with original research, and so I am finding it fit for GA.  SahabAli wadia  09:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)