Talk:Phosphatidylinositol phosphate

Categorisation
I've reverted the re-addition of parent categories since, as described at the bottom of the paragraph at WP:CAT, it's usually best to categorise articles in the most specific category available, which in this case is Category:Phospholipids.

If you have a look at Category:Chemistry, for example, you'll notice there are no other articles on specific chemicals at that level: this is because the category would be too enormous to browse if all the chemical were listed that high up. Hence sub-categories are used instead. Thanks, Clicketyclack 20:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

The term phospholipid is too narrow. Additional categories included so that readers may relate it to its context. Showjumpersam 21:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Reverted: how does adding parent categories, which as I pointed out contain no other articles on individual chemicals, help readers "relate it to its context"? Don't you think that context might be made clearer in the article, perhaps by growing its content beyond one line? Clicketyclack 08:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)