Talk:Phylogenetica

This group seems to be fictitious - I can't find any references anywhere to a "superdomain Phylogenetica". I understand why such a thing would be convenient, it would provide a root note for the biological tree. On the other hand, biologists don't seem to need a formally named root note, and we can't just make up a name for one and then pretend it's in current use. If I am mistaken, please provide some reference or explanation. Josh

Well! Lubesween is another name for the "Superdomain Phylogenetica". Gottfried Benn wrote in his novel "The Trainee Man" that there is such Superdomain as Phylogenetica. Belffed

That doesn't seem like it justifies treating it as if it were a standard part of classifications. It's not, nobody seems to use it. If we're going to discuss it, we should discuss it as a suggested term, not as if it were something biologists recognize. Josh

WTF?
Articles should not redirect to their talk pages, that's ridiculous. —Keenan Pepper 15:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)