Talk:Physical (Dua Lipa song)

This article should be deleted
I don't find any results for this article on English Wikipedia when trying to search for it on Google, which means that this article failed to gain popularity outside Wikipedia. I therefore wants this article to be deleted. Please discuss the deletion here. Karamellpudding1999 (talk) 08:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Genres
For future reference, here is what the majority of sources have said:


 * Power pop
 * The Arts Desk: Billy Idol/Pat Benatar 80s power pop (“Physical”)
 * Billboard: For those yearning for stars to return to music’s power-pop heydays, “Physical” took that ideation completely over the edge.
 * Hot Press: the best of '80s power pop
 * Official Charts Company: Physical is nearing Bonnie Tyler levels of power pop.
 * The Face: massive power pop anthem.
 * Vogue: Dua Lipa’s power-pop number “Physical,”

 Cool Marc  ✉   19:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Synth-pop
 * Billboard: Lipa's '80s-indebted synthpop single "Physical"
 * Billboard: The frenetic synth-pop workout
 * E! Online: On "Physical," she takes a trip back to the '80s with the synth-pop sound
 * Idolator: Dua Lipa Takes Us Back To The ’80s On Synth-Pop Anthem “Physical”
 * The Korea Times: the sensual synth-pop number
 * Some sources viewed elements of the composition as synth-pop such as the groove and instrumental

GA Nomination
, is one of the first lines on the WP:GAI page. I can’t see any public record of a consultation between the nominator and article contributors.—NØ 14:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * @MaranoFan, Coolmarc has retired, Username6892 was simply taking over for him in order to get the article to GA as Coolmarc retracted his nomination. LOVI  33  14:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , Username6892 have one edit to the article which is a revert. It would be highly recommended they consult one of the top 10 contributors to the article prior to a nomination. This really isn’t hard to understand.—NØ 14:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm the forth most contributor (even though I haven't done much compared to ), should I nominate it then? LOVI  33  14:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

It does look like Coolmarc has retired for real this time. Since he is disproportionately the only major contributor of this article, and cannot be approached for his permission, U6892 may proceed with the nomination. For future reference, the latter is not permitted to nominate it at FAC due to the lack of contributions.—NØ 09:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)