Talk:Physical fitness and nutrition of Bruce Lee

Unnecessary separate page

 * This article substantially replicates content on the main Bruce Lee article. There is no doubt that physical fitness characterised Bruce Lee. There is no doubt, either, that Bruce Lee fans are interested in reading about his physical fitness. However, even fanaticism does not justify a separate encyclopaedia entry.

Please can editors who disagree with this clearly state why in a line. Otherwise, I propose that this duplicate page be removed. Astral Highway (talk) 19:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't be silly. This section was huge in the main article. I've condensed much of it down in the main article which is shown on here. Now this article can be expanded... And actually whether or not I happen to be a fan of Lee or not, his fitness and diet has a mass of potential sources to make it notable in its own right. Such a topic for most people would not be notable, but Lee is unique in this respect and there are sources and enough coverage to prove this.  Himalayan   22:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * You know what? You argue this point well and have got me to change my original opinion.  The full nutrition and fitness page would indeed make the main page too unwieldy. Bravo.   Astral Highway  (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources required
Poorly cited entries should be removed. Fan sites such as "http://www.bruceleedivinewind.com/feats.html" do not contain any source of its quotes and should not be considered reliable. Identifying reliable sources has more information. Shawnc (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Strongly agree. We need book citations or something. These web sources aren't reliable, and I was ashamed to see so many [unreliable source?]s here... this article needs significant trimming, and can probably instead be included as a paragraph or two on the Bruce Lee article instead of the article linking to this page. This article, as is, is not encyclopaedic. DVD commentary, magazine interviews, something... fansites don't cut it; most of those links don't qualify as reputable sources. if i remember, i'm going to summarize this article into Bruce Lee and request its deletion 174.20.115.194 (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles like this one makes wikipedia look bad. 1% body fat???. Show me one body builder who has 1% body fat. This article belongs to an blog for a Lee Cult. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.64.141.117 (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)