Talk:Pi Delta Kappa

Delete?
I think PDK should stay. There are many people who want to know about defunct fraternities and sororities. Bairds is the major source of information, so if Bairds mentions it with Pi Phi and Sig Kap, then it is important. Bairds orders sororities by their size, colleges, etc. PDK was just as important as notable sororities at one point. Other fraternities like SAE and TriDelt mentioning PDK is worth noting. Those groups didn't mention every group in their magazines, only the important ones. PDK is important. Just let it stay! 158.59.210.254 (talk) 15:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Saying Baird's mentions it 'with Pi Phi and Sig Kap' is simply deceptive. Yes, Baird's mentions all of those, but PDK can't ride piggyback on the more notable organizations. Your statement that the group was 'just as notable etc', even if it were true, is unverifiable--at the least it's unverified in the article in its present state. But your zeal is appreciated, if not by this current editor, then surely by the many people you mention who will derive invaluable information from the article. Drmies (talk) 03:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD result

 * Page Pi delta kappa was nominated for AfD on 28 November 2008 (UTC) at Articles for deletion/Pi delta kappa. The result was no consensus. (Ref Talk:Pi delta kappa). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)