Talk:Pi de les Tres Branques

English
The article is largely based on non-English refs, so WP:NOENG is something to look at. Widefox ; talk 18:43, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

"snag"
User:Mountolive has been changing the term "tree" in the article to "snag". Now, "snag" is apparently an obscure American term for a dead tree. It does not appear (in that sense) in dictionary.com. It appears in Oxford as an American term. It does appear in (the American) Merriam-Webster. The article was written by me in Hiberno-English, and "tree" is common to all varieties of English, therefore according to WP:COMMONALITY that term should be used. I therefore propose to revert the change again. &mdash; Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 20:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Please remember that the term in question has its own wikipedia article (see snag (ecology). I guess that the reason for this term to be "obscure" is because it is science (ecology) related. This is not Simple English wikipedia, but an online encyclopedia where users should expect to be challenged by finding otherwise "obscure" terms.
 * Moreover, the term is necessary so as to make clear that the tree is actually dead (has been for about one century). By using 'the snag word' it immediately becomes self-evident.
 * Last but not least, please consider the fact that I initially placed 'the snag word' in three different places throughout the article. After noticing your concern, I have used it just once.  MOUNTOLIVE  fedeli alla linea 10:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)