Talk:Piano Concerto for the Left Hand (Ravel)

Page history
This page was excerpted from Piano Concerto for the Left Hand, which is now redirected to Piano Concerto. A history of this article can be found here. Cheers. --Ben "bleh fu" K 18:18, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Right hand
Can I play it with my right hand? freshgavin TALK    03:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

2006 rewrite
Working on rewriting this page. More to come. -MarkBuckles 17:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I've added much more information, some analysis, an example, and a list of references. The musical discussion still needs to be fleshed out more, as does the reception section. -MarkBuckles 18:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Non-specific references
I'm investigating the two (one, now that I've deleted one) remaining non-footnote general references, and will delete or integrate as footnotes depending what I find.

To start with, I am deleting this general reference:
 * Kelly, Barbara. "Ravel, Maurice", Grove Music Online ed. L. Macy,  (subscription access)

I read the article and it's about Ravel, not the Concerto. It barely mentions the Concerto, referring to it in only 3 sentences: TJRC (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * One general sentence that Ravel composed it 1829-1830 for Wittgenstein, who had lost an arm; well-supported by other references.
 * "The introduction of the Concerto for the Left Hand is based on the secondary dominant pedal E, which resolves to A at the piano's entry before reaching the tonic D major." This is used in the article. As this is the only passage about the structure of the Concerto, and is in a larger context about Ravel's work in general, I'm not inclined to try to shoehorn this into the "Structure" section. I'd rather find other material that discusses it in context.
 * One work in a list of four as an example of Ravel's "exuberant orchestral textures"; not used in text of article, and more about Ravel's style in general than the Concerto.

Follow-up: The Masson reference is in French, which I do not read. I've been able to get enough out of it to see that it is the source for Ravel's two comments about the movement divisions. The text previously cited to some unnamed and impossible-to-find articles for these bits: "Daily Telegraph, 11 July 1931, p. 364" and "Le Journal, 14 January 1933, p. 328". without having paper copies of the indicated 80-year-old newspapers, these are impossible to verify. The Masson article also cites them in exactly this way, untitledly, and my assumption is that is where the editor who added them actually got the cites. I've removed the two newspapers and cited directly to the Masson article.

In addition to that article text, Masson is name-checked in the text as well, and I also put it in as a note to that statement. This cleans up the non-footnote general references. TJRC (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)