Talk:Picardy Spaniel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Xtzou ( Talk ) 23:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have gone through the article and remedied issues of grammar and tense. I am a fan of your dog articles and have read your pass GAs. I am ready to pass this one if you have no objects to my edits. Please feel free to remedy any mistakes I have made. Xtzou ( Talk ) 23:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Xtzou ( Talk ) 23:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!


 * Great, thanks for reviewing! Miyagawa   (talk)  10:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)