Talk:Picogen

"Advertisment"
When I look at [] or other projects at [], then where exactly does this article lack external (3rd party) references more than some of the other articles? Just curious.

It lacks references, of course, because it is a relatively new software. I personally like that when I search for software, wikipedia is one of my favorised sources of information, and I am happy that also new or relatively unknown software will be found. On the other hand, there is primarily sourceforge, but which doesn't cover all good software and is proprietary, and google, which is unfree too, with biased search results.

So, if anyone can help me improving this article to make it look less like an advertisement (from which I don't materially profit), this would be highly welcome.

Phresnel (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)