Talk:Piedmont Park/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Piedmont Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * Format the references according to WP:CITE/ES, preferably using cite web.
 * For header titles, when a word is not a proper noun, the first letter should be lowercase. For example, "Activities and Facilities" &rarr; "Activities and facilities"
 * Even though the "Park Schedule" section is short, it still needs a reference.

Gary King ( talk ) 03:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Publishers are required for all references.
 * Use en dashes for numerical ranges like "1902-1902" &rarr; "1902–1902", per WP:DASH.

Gary King ( talk ) 16:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Seven days have passed and these issues have not been addressed, therefore, this article has failed its Good Article nomination. Gary King ( talk ) 05:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Review Failure
Thank you for your review. However, I am a little offended that you posted additional changes to your review the day before the review period expired. I will make the changes and reapply for good article status. In the future, it would be nice if you could post your review information further in advance.SweetMelissaGT (talk) 19:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Even if we exclude the additional changes, the initial comments were not addressed (or if they were, a comment should be made here.) 7 days for changes to be made is completely standard for WP:GAN. Gary King ( talk ) 19:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)