Talk:Pier Gerlofs Donia/GA1

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 9, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Not well-written: weak prose.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Not even close: no references, no footnotes, lots of original research.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Doesn't look like it.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: No. Article uses an obviously biased tone.
 * 5. Article stability? Yes.
 * 6. Images?: OK.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. — An as  talk? 10:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Checklist

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

— An as  talk? 10:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail: