Talk:Pierce the Ploughman's Crede

POV
I tagged a statement in the "Significant contents" section for POV; however, the entire section reads like an essay rather than an encyclopedia article and is chock-full of unattributed opinions. It's not clear whose opinions the statements are, making the problem difficult to repair without savaging the section. Rather than take that step, perhaps an expert on the subject would care to address attribution. Richigi (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Differentiation needed
It needs to be stated in the introductory lead section that this is different from the similarly-named Piers Plowman... AnonMoos (talk) 21:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)