Talk:Pierre Gamarra

Assessment comment
To improve the article, the lead should summarize the article per MOS:LEAD. The footnotes are currently explanations and two citations and it is not clear from the sources section what article information comes from what source. The style is sometimes vague and could be more plain ("For a very short time" is unclear, "until the War bursted" - better to explicitly state what war is meant and "bursted" sounds unencyclopedic, could be simply "began"). To the author/authors: I often write articles using other articles on similar topics that I like (or are featured) as templates to save work, perhaps this could work here. Feel free to request a new assessment when you feel the article has improved. Best regards Hekerui (talk) 20:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the assessment and comment. That's most helpful. --Pierre et Condat (talk) 00:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

B-class review for WP:BIO
A review as requested at WikiProject Biography/Assessment. This article is around C-class. Unreferenced claims, overall sparse amount of text (French Wikipedia's article is much larger) prevent this from assessed as B-class at this time. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:43, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, Piotrus and thank you very much for the rating and comment. I added some references to address the first issue you raised. Have a nice day.--36.55.136.115 (talk) 21:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)