Talk:Pillau-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 07:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b) . Looking good in terms of MOS. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

: Well-cited, and references all noted duly. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

: As far as I can tell, it covers all coverable aspects of the subject. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. Article displays good neutrality on its subject. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC) . No sign of edit warring/disputes in the history link. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC) : No images at present, but while it is preferred, it isn't mandatory. At least this way we know for sure that all current image use in the article follows copyright law! ;) Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

Comments:
 * "[Pillau] assisted the badly damaged battlecruiser SMS Seydlitz reach port on 2 June" I understand this means that the ship helped the other ship to reach port, but when "assisted" is the synonym of "help" used, isn't it better grammar to say "in reaching port"? I am not 100% certain of this, so please ignore this if it is alright. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I think the current version is better. Think of it this way: "Steve helped Joe study for..." instead of "Steve helped Joe in studying for..." Parsecboy (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright then. That's about the only thing that caught me in this review. This is a very well-written page, and will finally get the classification it deserves! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 21:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)