Talk:Pilotwings 64/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Airplaneman  talk 20:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Checklist & comments

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I will copyedit myself unless I am not sure, in which case I will list the problems below for you to address:
 * Under the "Gameplay" section, the lead sentence, Pilotwings 64 is a 3D flight simulator in which the player must complete a variety of missions using different airborne vehicles and aerial sports. I think it is meant to say something along the lines of Pilotwings 64 is a 3D flight simulator in which the player must complete a variety of missions using different airborne vehicles in many aerial sports events. or something. Please clarify. Airplaneman  talk 20:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ &mdash; will pass. Airplaneman  talk 03:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Checklinks fine. Sources look good. Airplaneman  talk 20:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: