Talk:Pimp Juice (drink)

This reads like a well writen article, it includes origins and contraversy over the drink. I think the deletion flag is unwarrented. Im not sure about the specific policy but even if it was more like a ad, i think it should be set for a normal vote based deletion. That would ensure objectivity. In summation, I believe this is much more than a product ad, even though you wouldn't catch me drinking it ZyMOS (talk) 06:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I only tag them for speedy delete. An Admin declined deletion so if its good enough for them. So I guess I was a bit hasty.  Sting_au   Talk  06:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow! Article went from creation to well written, referenced and with a table in less than two days.  I agree that given the controversy, particularly the USA Today article, it passes notability.  WLU (talk) 18:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks in no small part to you. It has certainly come a long way since I first tagged it with a speedy. I do a few newpage patrols when I'm in the mood, and I can only go on what I see first up.  Sting_au   Talk  21:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I'm awesome. I will point out that even the first version, from what I can see, would have passed WP:N and WP:CORP based on the USA Today article alone in my opinion.  WLU (talk) 21:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)