Talk:Pinales

"merge Pinophyta" - done; there was no content not already in Pinophyta - MPF 14:44, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
 * I reverted your change. That proposal is silly. There is always a need to have articles on higher orders in taxonomy. Merging would only make sense if there was one class, one order, one family, and one genus. That much of the content is elsewhere is beside the point. Your proposal seems to be going in the direction of having just one article on everything about conifers, when there could and should be dozens - Marshman 17:17, 19 May 2004 (UTC)

Reason for removing vague
After [this Google Search|http://www.google.com/search?q=order+taxales&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&start=10&sa=N], I could not come up with definate dates. I therefore gave a disclaimer to wrap it up. Please post any contradictory evidence.Willy625 (talk) 03:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Article Split?
Should the scope of this article be split per the classification in Christenhusz (2011) -- Kev min  § 00:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Pinales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141129030910/http://zipcodezoo.com/Key/Plantae/Pinales_Order.asp to http://zipcodezoo.com/Key/Plantae/Pinales_Order.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Discussion of Gymnosperm Classification and Its History Needs to Be On The Gymnosperm Page
The discussion of the development of Gymnosperm classification here is very good (I had been looking for a treatment of this), but it is odd to find in on the page for Order Pinales rather than for clade Gymnosperm, a page that provides no information about the history of its classification, nor insight its current status.