Talk:Ping-ti Ho

New Qing History
This sentence is extremely misleading: "The school now known as the New Qing History appeared in American academia after his famous debate with Evelyn Rawski in 1996." It wrongly implies both that Ho was responsible for the New Qing History and that he has been judged as having come down on the right side of the debate with Rawski. Quite the opposite is true; scarcely any serious historian of China today thinks Ho's ideas about "Sinicization" are still viable, and in fact Rawski has been one of the leaders of the New Qing History movement.--108.36.159.94 (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Glad to see that the wording has been improved in the current version.--96.245.98.213 (talk) 16:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ping-ti Ho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725051819/http://www.chiamonline.org/People/GK/ho.htm to http://www.chiamonline.org/People/GK/ho.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)