Talk:Pink (Aerosmith song)

Untitled
Isn't this inaccurate? There is a repeat of the lines

Pink...it was love at first sight Yeah, pink...when I turn out the light And pink gets me high as a kite And I think everything is going to be alright No matter what we do tonight

...That's a chorus. 12.162.122.6 (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree. Those lyrics return 3 times during the song. (The third time, "pink gets me high as a kite" is changed to "pink, it's like red but not quite," but it is common to alter lyrics like this in rock songs for a final chorus.) That alone should justify calling it a chorus. Additionally, the instrumentation is much more emphatic for the 5 lines that we are referring to as the chorus (I think the verses are mostly acoustic guitar while the chorus has full band plus harmony vocals, but I'm going from memory), which helps emphasize the fact that it's the chorus.

I think part of the confusion (on the part of the original author of the article) is that the chord structure is essentially the same for the verse and chorus, and that's why they said (incorreclty IMHO) that there was no set chorus. Another element of confusion is that the majority of the lines of the song (both verse and chorus) begin with the word "pink." Still I think most listeners would agree that the section beginning "Pink...it was love at first sight" is the chorus. Jkisch (talk) 06:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Music video
Is it just me, or is the synopsis for this video WAY too detailed? The description is practically a shot-by-shot breakdown of the entire video. Drpickem (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Definitely. The current synopsis is ridiculous. 209.90.140.72 (talk) 20:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

What really gets me is the atrocious grammar. This was definitely typed up by someone who doesn't speak English as a first language. Usually, I correct these when I see them, but there's so much here I don't know where to begin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rattlesnake269 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 27 May 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 08:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Pink (song) → Pink (Aerosmith song) – Ambiguous; see Pink (Lizzo song). 162 etc. (talk) 05:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Rename per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support the Aerosmith song has 1,342 views but the Lizzo song has 766 and Pynk has 467[|Pink_(Lizzo_song)|Pynk] which isn't enough for a PDAB.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. There's no clear WP:primary topic between the two songs|Pink_(Lizzo_song) (although Pynk is not a factor, as a different spelling). Station1 (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support repoint the current name to the disambiguation page pink (disambiguation) -- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 06:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support as neither are the primary topic. Aoba47 (talk) 22:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)