Talk:Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up

EP?
It's not an EP!It's a re-release!--Nikinikolananov (talk) 19:38, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

EP or box set?
With the editing going back and forth over the past few days, it has become apparent that there is no clear consensus if The Re-Up is to be categorized as an EP or a box set. Like an EP, the first disc contains only eight songs, about thirty minutes in length. However, it is only sold packaged with the original album, and is not available as a standalone piece. Like an box set, the product holds three discs, with the two musical discs and the DVD. The sticker on the physical album describes it as a "3 disc set", with no mention of an EP. A consensus should be established to avoid any future conflicting edits such as those we've recently seen. 68DANNY2 (talk) 16:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Merge
Should this article be merged with Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded as it is a re-release? Thanks :) CMBCMB999 (Speak) 05:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "vibe": From Freedom (Nicki Minaj song):  From Nicki Minaj:  From Young Money Entertainment:  From Champion (Nicki Minaj song):  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

The Pink Print
Nicki wrote on her twitter that the "Pink Friday" era is over! CoolAbc (talk) 11:02, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm Legit
Hi!Can somebody delete or merge the I'm Legit article with the PF:RR - The Re-Up page?It's copied from http://nickiminaj.wikia.com/wiki/I'm_Legit!Nikinikolananov (talk) 12:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I propose that "I'm Legit" be merged into The Re-Up article. The song hasn't been released as a single, nor has it even been confirmed as one. Minor buzz doesn't make a subject worthy of an entire article dedicated to it. If/when it is released, then the discussion to make a separate article can be reopened, but for now, I think it is doing just fine in the main album's article. Also, as previously mentioned, the article is an exact copy from the Nicki Minaj Wikia. 68DANNY2 (talk) 21:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The entire article is unsourced, so "merging" it would simply be adding unsourced content to an article. Dan56 (talk) 21:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Good point, so then the article should just be redirected. 68DANNY2 (talk) 22:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Done. The I'm Legit article was a complete copyright violation of the Nicki Minaj Wikia anyway. SMC (talk) 02:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I am the creator of I'm Legit page. I am also an user in the Nicki Minaj Wikia. I apologize for copyright violation, but I've seen a thousand of articles related to Nicki Minaj that have the exact text as Nicki Minaj Wikia. I've even seen people put reference links to the Nicki Minaj Wikia. I didn't know I would violate copyright, that's why I did it. Diar7 (talk) 20:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually, you're right. Having looked closer at the Nicki Minaj Wikia, it appears that all Wikia content is (unless otherwise stated) compatible with CC-BY-SA 3.0, which is what Wikipedia requires. Anyway, in this case the I'm Legit article needed to be redirected anyway because it was not officially a single (even though some of us may infer that it will be). However, the Nicki Minaj Wikia wouldn't count as a good reference, so it can't be used as a reference. Instead, articles need their own third-party references (e.g. interviews, critics reviews, etc.) SMC (talk) 03:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I understand. It's ok since the page didn't have much info in the first place, lol. Sorry, again. Diar7 (talk) 12:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm an administrator in the Nicki Minaj Wiki (a.k.a Wiki Minaj). All the content in any wiki of Wikia can be borrowed and used as you like since is licensed like Wikipedia. Also, you can see that Wiki Minaj has Quality Standards that require the use of reliable sources. Now is pretty common to see users copying all our content and paste it in Wikipedias article (Va Va Voom, Freedom, The Boys, The Re-Up, all of them had copied content at some point but was later changed), and, since we use sources/references in our articles, the copied articles are accepted in Wikipedia. I will appreciate if users of Wikipedia give credit to Wiki Minaj, since we do the same for Wikipedia. Although, we don't have any problem with it. Have a nice day, and excuse my English. --200.12.39.93 (talk) 14:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

OK and i think that this is exactly the same as the Wiki Minaj article for the song "Masquerade".Isn't it?And that this is the same as the Wiki Minaj page for HOV Lane?--Nikinikolananov (talk) 10:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Infobox
Allmusic refers to the release as an EP here. If any other reliable source is found stating the album is a box set or studio album, it can be changed. Reliable sources should be presented here first. —  Diva    Knockouts   14:31, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd personally lean towards a compilation album, since The Re-Up is the previously-released Roman Reloaded packaged with eight new songs. And the new disc isn't sold separately. WikiRedactor (talk) 21:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Disc 2
this article is muy confusing to someone who hasn't got the album. after much rereading, i *believe* what is being said is: "disc 1 = new material, disc 2 = VIDEOS, disc 3 = original album", right? on which point, i gotta ask: is disc 3 EXACTLY roman reloaded? then that should be stated EXPLICITLY somewhere.

a noob first reading the track section has no sense of what's new and what's rehash without a lot of back and forth to the "reloaded" article. the intro paragraphs give a reasonable description, but along with an expectation that disc 1 would be the old stuff, then disk 2 and/or 3 the new stuff. which is not the case!

moreover, what IS the stuff on disc 2?! audio or video, there's all sorts of new titles on there! if it's just music videos or "behind the scenes" of her singing the songs on discs 1 and 3, what the heck are things like "make me proud" and "broken silence" doing on there???? not to mention all those "beats"?!

i know "make me proud" was a duet she did with drake (not sure offhand about broken silence), but how does it fit in to everything else here? there's no audio version of it on EITHER disc 1 or disc 3, right? so what's the point of a video?!

so would a better description be: "disc 1 = new material, disc 2 = videos of songs both ON the album and songs NOT ON the album, disc 3 = original album" ??

NEEDS REWORK! 209.172.25.188 (talk) 03:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The track listing included on Wikipedia is exactly how it is presented in the album. Throughout the article, you'll see that the set includes the standard edition of the original album, the disc with the eight newly-recorded songs, and the DVD. This is already addressed several times in the article (introduction, background, and track listing). WikiRedactor (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * LOL. did u actually READ my post?! 209.172.25.204 (talk) 04:19, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

cmon, the track list may be complete but no attempt was made to indicate WHICH PART of it was the new stuff, which part was the old stuff, or what ANY of the stuff on disk 2 is (videos of WHAT, if not the songs on either 1 or 3?!). one shouldn't have to fumble back and forth to the non-reup page doing a point by point comparison to figure this out. 209.172.25.220 (talk) 02:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * LOL. Yes I did read your post. Straight from the article: "In November, she added that the expanded album would contain an additional disc with eight newly-recording songs and an exclusive behind-the-scenes DVD to supplement the standard edition of the original album." Disc 1: The Re-Up with the eight tracks, Disc 2: The Re-Up DVD with the behind-the-scenes footage, Disc 3: Roman Reloaded with the original album. Sorry, but I don't see how it can get any clearer than that. WikiRedactor (talk) 20:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * well, for starters, your key line there is NOT IN the quote, and fairly close to what i suggested. so you too apparently feel the need to clarify the overview given.


 * i'd suggest ADDING that to the quote, with a couple of corrections: 1) you can't really call disc 1 "the re-up" if the 3-disc set is called that as a whole. again, i'd suggest "disc 1: new material (8 tracks)" or somesuch; 2) WHAT is disc 2 "behind-the-scenes footage" OF?!  another album?  material from a forthcoming re-re-up?  outtakes of american idol?!  a cursory look reveals very few of the titles on disc 2 have anything TO DO with the disc 1 songs; and 3) just for clarity...is disc 3 EXACTLY the original roman reloaded album?  no tweaks, no "remastered", nothing?  just a marketing ploy to make u buy a new copy?  in which case it's really a 2-disc album "bundled with" something most people already own.


 * i won't dwell on that, but let's be accurate here: "disc 1) NEW ALBUM, disc 2) behind-the-scenes footage of god knows what, disc 3) coaster"


 * agreed? 209.172.25.7 (talk) 23:27, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6DX61P6XG to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-albums-2012.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

"Pink Friday II: Roman Reloaded (The Sequel)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pink Friday II: Roman Reloaded (The Sequel) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 15:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)