Talk:Pink slime/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Encycloshave (talk · contribs) 14:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Tick box
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: overall, but a few
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Review Comments
Cheers! Encycloshave (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Reliable sources:
 * "Seven Million Pounds of “Pink Slime” Beef Destined for National School Lunch Program" is a Yahoo blog, which which may not meet the standards of WP:IRS. What do we know of the editorial control and reliability of Yahoo writers? And what do we know about Sarah B. Weir?
 * A few bits are sourced from company-run sites, but most are duplicated by reliable news sources.
 * Neutrality: Neutrality issues raised on the talk page seem to have been addressed.
 * Stable: There seemed to have been some concerns in April, but they seem to have been addressed.