Talk:Pioneer Village station

Dubious claim of no fare booths
Yesterday I visited the six stations on the extension -- it was opening day.

This article claims none of the new stations will have fare booths. But I certainly saw TTC fare booths. Geo Swan (talk) 14:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

DATES

 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I think the date format in this article should be DMY not MDY as is fairly standard for Canadian articles. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * As per MOS:DATETIES, "Articles related to Canada or Israel may use either format (July 4, 1976 or 4 July 1976) with (as always) consistency within each article". In my experience, the former is more common. Examples include: Canada, Justin Trudeau, Line 1 Yonge–University, Toronto subway, and adjacent stations on the same subway line (York University station, Highway 407 station). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blaixx (talk • contribs) 01:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I disagree with you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:56, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That's nice you disagree and all, but MOS:DATEVAR says we keep the existing format, which is mdy. Most TTC stations are mdy; some are dmy. Since both formats are acceptable in Canada-related article, as has pointed out on more than one occasion, you have zero legs to stand on. Also, I edit tonnes of Canadian articles and I would actually say the bulk are mdy. Whether you like that or not, or I like that or not, is irrelevant. It's also ridiculous to have called an RfC on this without attempting to have a discussion first. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

PV station - RFC
Which date format should this article use? DMY or MDY? Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * MDY – per MOS:DATETIES and MOS:DATEVAR. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * MDY – I think the MOS is very clear and unambiguous. BLAIXX 20:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * MDY for the text, and it really doesn't matter to me what the ref date format is as long as they are consistent. Summoned by bot. I use YMD (2018-09-18) myself for the refs, but if I edit an existing article, I try to keep the format consistent with the most common existing format. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  23:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.