Talk:Pipe organ/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

GA Sweeps: On hold
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to determine if the article should remain a Good article. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are several issues that needs to be addressed.


 * 1) I see there was a discussion on the talk page about adjusting the lead a few months ago, but it is still sitting at six paragraphs. For an article of this length it should be three to four.
 * 2) Address all of the citation needed tags found throughout the article.
 * 3) For the external links, the online radio stations and databases don't need their own full headings. The external links should be trimmed to include only the most notable links that readers can go to after visiting this article. Consider using some for sourcing the article's content if they are reliable.

This article covers the topic well and has an excellent source of free images. I will review the article's prose once the above issues are addressed. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed, one may be given. If no progress is made, the article may be delisted, which can then later be renominated at WP:GAN. I'll contact all of the main contributors and related WikiProjects so the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm working on the lead now. Specifically, I'm comparing it with the lead as it was at the last FAC review, attempting to merge the best of both. We'll see how it turns out. —Cor anglais 16 21:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The first issue was addressed. I am leaving the article on hold for another week for the citation and the external link issues to be dealt with. Please address these points so that the article is not delisted. If you have any questions, let me know. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I took a stab at the external links... I'll try to work on the tags this week. —Cor anglais 16 23:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I have finished working on the tags and other assorted random minor improvements. Hope the result is acceptable for the GA sweeps. —Cor anglais 16 21:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps: Kept
Good work addressing the issues. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. Altogether the article is well-written and has a great source of free images. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to update the access dates for all of the online sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)