Talk:Pippa Middleton

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pippa Middleton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110513224608/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23948607-everything-you-never-knew-about-pippa-middleton.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23948607-everything-you-never-knew-about-pippa-middleton.do
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110826100023/http://royalweddings.org.uk/kate-middletons-sister-pippa-a-socialite-butterfly/ to http://royalweddings.org.uk/kate-middletons-sister-pippa-a-socialite-butterfly/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110152630/http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/article/TMG8681704/Debenhams-produce-170-copy-of-Pippa-Middletons-bridesmaid-dress.html to http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/article/TMG8681704/Debenhams-produce-170-copy-of-Pippa-Middletons-bridesmaid-dress.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110152630/http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/article/TMG8681704/Debenhams-produce-170-copy-of-Pippa-Middletons-bridesmaid-dress.html to http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/article/TMG8681704/Debenhams-produce-170-copy-of-Pippa-Middletons-bridesmaid-dress.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Father in law raping a child
I’m not sure if it’s rape or statutory rape (not that the latter is ok) but media is reporting her father in law “raped a child”. Disgusting! Completely important to include! 101.183.21.131 (talk) 02:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  03:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No, media is reporting that he is being investigated. Also, I'm not sure that this article is the right place for alleged crimes committed by inlaws.
 * how is rape not relevant public information??? 101.183.21.131 (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It would be relevant in his article if he had one, not in the article about his son's wife. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 02:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Matthews' father.
I've removed this information again. It's twice removed from the article subject - it's not about Pippa Middleton, it's not even about the bloke she's married, but it's about the bloke she's marrieds father. This is too tenuous for an article about Pippa Middleton. Chaheel Riens (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Hmmm.

Matthews senior has been charged with rape in France and is under investigation; a second accusation has also been made in the UK which, according to press reports, is also being investigated.

This entry includes information about James Matthews; it also includes information about David Matthews, including his name and the title that will pass to James Matthews (and Pippa Middleton) at some point. That information, as you haven't removed it, is presumably not "too tenuous" for the page. As Matthews senior has been charged in France and is under investigation in the UK, and is mentioned in this article, adding information about the charge in France and the investigation in the UK seems far from "tenuous".

Perhaps other editors would care to offer an opinion on whether the edit is "too tenuous" as is, or if the charge and investigation merits its own section on the page, or if a separate article on Matthews senior should be created.

You have not claimed BLP exemption for your reversions (as noted in the edit summary after un-doing one of your reversions, I have checked BLP and am satisfied the edit is bona fide).

I suggest we wait for the opinion of other editors, and/or open a Request for Comments on the edit; meanwhile, please refrain from making a third reversion to the page.

As you can see, I have also added a BLP Noticeboard template to also help with resolution.

82.30.20.170 (talk) 02:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This should definitely stay out until there is consensus to include it - 82.30.20.170, you have been warned about edit warring. Actually, it seems like a fairly clear-cut BLP issue: David Matthews is not a WP:PUBLICFIGURE. StAnselm (talk) 03:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with mentioning who the father is, but for a distinctly non-notable person that's all it should be - especially in an article that is about somebody else. If you can't find anywhere else to put the information that means that it doesn't go anywhere at all.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ’’’include’’’ rape by pippa’s father in law is relevant. And this is the best place to put it. I suspect only government stooges would ask for this info to be censored 101.183.21.131 (talk) 14:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:NPA, even by implication are not welcome here - although I am actually curious as to why you think "government stooges" would with to suppress such information. You have to explain why you think an article on Pippa Middleton is the relevant place to put an accusation of rape for a completely different person, who is by Wikiepdia's criteria non-notable.
 * Incidentally, I think you meant bold, not ’’’bold’’’, but that's by the by. 17:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Zero relevance to the subject so I cant see any reason why a father-in-law would even get a mention if not wiki-notable (that is has an article). MilborneOne (talk) 21:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Obviously not relevant for inclusion in this article. BabelStone (talk) 22:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

"Her Royal Hotness" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Her Royal Hotness. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 1 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf  (talk)  01:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Children
The birth of her children is mentioned but not the their name. Could it be added or violates any policy? Sira Aspera (talk) 16:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The names of children who aren't notable in their own right dont' need to be included per WP:BLPNAME.Unbh (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)