Talk:Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (soundtrack)

Love theme
Has anyone noticed that the opening notes from the love theme are identical to the ones from Titanic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surten (talk • contribs) 01:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pirates of the Caribbean At World's End soundtrack.jpg
Image:Pirates of the Caribbean At World's End soundtrack.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Filmtracks review
I have removed the filmtracks review from the "professional review" section as it is hardly professional. It called the score to the first film "brainless" and called Media Ventures/Remote Control Productions "imbecilic", which is not something that belongs on Wikipedia. It appears more the work of someone with a personal grief with the studio than the work of a professional reviewer. RadicalTwo (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

I have again removed the filmtracks review for exactly the reasons that RadicalTwo provided. It is very clear that this review is biased against the score (likely for a personal reason), and as such, should not be included on this page which should provide an unbiased view on this score. This is further shown when comparing this specific review to the vast majority of other professional reviews, which rated this score highly and looking at the comments page on the review. There was no reason provided for adding it again, so until there is a valid reason, it should stay removed.

Negative critical reception should be shown on this page, however, not when it is clearly biased.--NitroblastDigi (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)