Talk:Pirates of the Caribbean (film series)

Parlé/Parley
Is the inclusion of "Parlé" and the accompanying explanation of its root actually based on any official source, or just conjecture masquerading as fact? See Parley

Production has Begun.
I am at an external wiki for PotC... I have heard from a friend that they HAVE in fact begun production for the fourth movie. Here is what he said: ''"Ok, in the news articles that I've read(which one of them said that they start filming on June 14th). But now, I've just read these two official movie websites, and they said that Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides is in production now(they are filming as we speak). Here are the websites stating this: 1. http://www.movieset.com/pirates-of-the-caribbean-4

2. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1298650/ So, basically, I don't know if we should put that Pirates 4 is in production now or not. Because one of the websites that states this information, is imdb.com(obviously), and they already messed up with the "Jack and Barbossa meet up in New Orleans" thing, and it was confirmed to be false. Any suggestions? CJSFan 00:30, June 11, 2010 (UTC)"''

We should start the new article on On Stranger Tides.

reboot
There's been reports indicating that Disney is rebooting the series with the Deadpool Writers Reese and Wernick with Bruckheimer still as producer. I think, even though it is still a report and Disney has not make an official announcement, it is still a worthy piece of information. 182.253.184.178 (talk) 14:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Not without a reliable source. DonIago (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Update required
I've just watched Salazar's Revenge, of which there is no mention on this page, don't know when it was last updated but it obviously needs to be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Black Knight 17 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Accepting edits without checking them
The whole point of "pending changes" protection is so that confirmed editors can vet edits by non-confirmed editors. It is usually imposed on articles that have a history of disruptive editing, as is the case with this article, with an IP-hopping editor persistently removing sourced content. You accepted this latest edit without querying why the editor was deleting sourced content. If you are not going to give an edit appropriate consideration it defeats the purpose of requiring edits to be reviewed. Betty Logan (talk) 19:45, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * My apologies, I didn't realised so. Toadette Edit! 18:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)