Talk:Pisco sour/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 18:13, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Overall, pretty good. I made some copy-edits.
 * There is a problem with your translating comments, which are correctly cited, and then placing them in quotation marks. You can only directly quote sources, as they are in Spanish you shouldn't be reproducing them in English Wikipedia..  I have fixed the bottom two examples in the article.  You need to paraphrase and and then cite. ✅
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * You need to add the language=spanish parameter to Spanish sources. ✅
 * Sources appear reliable, no OR, sources support statements.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Good coverage.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * OK
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are OK, apart from the gallery of images of drinks which appears to be redundant, see WP:Galleries ✅
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, all done now. I am happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 22:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments

 * Thank you Jez for reviewing the article. I have done all of the fixes you recommended be done for the article. Best of wishes.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 21:41, 5 May 2012 (UTC)