Talk:Pitcher's mound

Merged
Merged into baseball field Judgesurreal777 23:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

De-Merged?
It looks like this page was de-merged, and a large portion of baseball field was copied and pasted here. I don't suppose it's really necessary unless this page is going to be expanded significantly beyond what's on the baseball field page... Chubbles 00:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

It SHould not be merged
I do not think that the articles should be merged because I think we should have a article on each part of the baseball game! Afterall baseball is one of the most popular sports! Why not have an Article? I mean if we have articles on swearwords why can't we have a simple article on pitchers mound —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.229.236.252 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The problem is, this article contributes nothing. It's completely pasted out from the baseball diamond article. If the pitcher's mound is to have its own article, it needs to have information beyond what's on the baseball diamond page. Chubbles 23:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The point of the merge was to consolidate the content and make one better article. If baseball field gets to Good Article status and there is so much sourced information, then it should be made into its own article. Otherwise, why should we have a stubby article? Judgesurreal777 00:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Unless there are further objections, I'd like to restore Judge's redirect. Chubbles 01:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)