Talk:Pitchfork (website)/Archive 2

Regarding the ‘Factual errors’ section
Why is this the title of this subsection? When it talks about misrepresentation and assumptions. It seems like a poorly names section in my opinion. Iokerapid (talk) 04:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Now edited. Next time, if no-one objects to something on the talk page, feel free to just go ahead and change it. Anywikiuser (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

XXXTentacion Section
Longtime Wikipedia reader, never edited before, but the section about their coverage of XXXTentacion strikes me as weirdly unbalanced. Unspecific assertion that 'many' felt that their coverage of his criminal history was biased, out of place refutations of specific terminology used in the article, and the only source used is a single XXXTentacion biography. I don't think this content belongs in this article, it's out of place and very poorly written and cited. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.169.84 (talk) 11:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)