Talk:Pitfalls

Edit Warring
Please stop. Content disputes need to be resolved here. Thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no reason to repeat "Albums" every time you add another chart or use a line break to make a column narrower, except to copy what other articles have done and make it look like what you want it to, which is an accusation that has been thrown at me when I had good faith reasons for my edits. Cognissonance (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't need to be pinged. And oh, okay. So your reasons are "good faith", not you wanting to control every aspect of the article, but mine aren't good faith. Gotcha. Yes, it must be my desire to make the article worse. I don't see a good reason why this article should differ from thousands of other album articles because one editor doesn't want it that way. It's not just how I want it to look. It's how thousands of other editors who've added chart wikitables with the same formatting want it to look. Including Lk95, who added the chart table to this article in the first place.  Ss  112   00:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It's called copyediting, representing the same information ("[country] Albums") but with less words ([country]). Using a line break is your preference, but we should let the columns expand according to their titles, like the Content overview does with sections. Cognissonance (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It's not my preference—as I just said, it's used on thousands of articles and I didn't invent the style. Also, your edit summary here is misleading. By saying "sourced info", you act like I didn't source the information I added in my prior edits. There was nothing I added in my edits that wasn't sourced, and if that's not what you intended it to mean then it certainly reads that way. Not being to your liking is not the same thing as being unsourced. I'd revert your latest two edits, but it's clear you'll edit war and complain until you get your way. If you intend to nominate this for GA status, I will be making a comment that the charts section is poorly formatted and non-standard and will not support it being passed until it is brought into line with the standard of other articles—not subject to the whims of one editor who believes their pet project should differ from all other articles.  Ss  112   02:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You're hysterical. "sourced info" means that I added info from a source that was already there. Cognissonance (talk) 03:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * And you're delusional, because that makes no damn sense. I don't know why anybody would need to say "sourced info" when it's expected it would be sourced. Who specifies that unless they're adding a source to unsourced info? But sure, whatever you say. I'll be looking out for the impending GAN and be sure to comment at it.  Ss  112   03:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 8 November 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Pitfalls → Pitfalls (album) – Album recent creation, but the primary topic for pitfalls is pitfall, not an album. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The disambiguation page is already linked on top of the article. More clarification is not needed. Cognissonance (talk) 08:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:PLURALPT. Only WP topic called "Pitfalls", and none of the other "Pitfall" topics are likely to be sought by the plural form (even in pitfall trap, there is no use of "pitfalls" in the article. Pitfall itself is a dab page, because WP:NOTADICTIONARY. Dohn joe (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose Pageviews are high enough that this seems like the WP:PLURALPT per Dohn joe.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Support. Clear primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 *  Oppose - Oppose per Dohn joe, since there is a hatnote at the top of the page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this was a well-known album from a well-known band then I might agree, but an obscure album from an obscure band? No. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page views for Hazard
Given that Pitfalls means Hazards, see |Pitfalls|Hazard|Trapping_pit|Pitfall_trap Pitfall vs Pitfalls vs Hazard In ictu oculi (talk) 12:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  Reply - So? --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)