Talk:Pitru Paksha/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Comment: The article is not well written and contains extensive original research. The sub-headers of the article are also not per Wikipedia good article standards. The lead does not well summarise major themes of the article. -- Tamra vidhir  (talk) 09:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Article state when passed in April 2010 and today is more or less similar in the aspects that you point out (i.e. lead summary, sub-headers and inadequate referencing)., who took it to GA then, has credit of making many Hinduism articles into GAs/FAs. I doubt anything he has written is OR; unless it was slipped in later on by other editors. It would help the re-assessment if you were less generic and more specific. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:16, 17 September 2019 (UTC)