Talk:Pittsburgh Maulers (1984)

Fair use rationale for Image:PittsburghMaulers2.GIF
Image:PittsburghMaulers2.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Orange or Renaissance Red?
According to this source: http://www.ssur.org/research/TeamColors/Football_Outdoor/UnitedStatesFootballLeague/popup.htm?images/PittsburghMaulers_FRC_1985_SOL_SRGB.png

It says that the secondary color was Renaissance Red not orange. Which is the true color? How can we verify exactly? Rick lay95 (talk) 02:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)rick_lay95
 * The SSUR site is actually run by researchers who are affiliated with the Professional Football Researchers Association, which has a long-standing reputation for being an authority on pro football history and has worked with the Hall of Fame. So I trust their analysis more and will change the color to Renaissance Red, unless anyone has an objection.--Pennsylvania Penguin (talk) 16:41, 19 January 2011 (UTC)